Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Communication dans un congrès

Can Nudges Promote Professional Skepticism in Audits?

Abstract : The effectiveness of nudges is widely acknowledged in behavioral sciences, though less is known about their usefulness and applicability in accounting or auditing contexts. By contextualizing nudge theory in financial audit settings, this article offers experimental verification of the effects of social norms and justification nudges on audit behavior. Two between-subject experiments (2 social norms x 2 justification) indicate positive effects of nudges on professional skepticism, which provides a marker of audit quality. Then an eye-tracking experiment, conducted during an audit task, helps clarify the cognitive mechanism at play. Specifically, nudged conditions are associated with greater visual attention during assessments of audit evidence. Combined findings thus suggest that nudges are effective at increasing auditors’ visual attention to relevant information, which in turn raises professional skepticism in assessments of audit evidence.
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal-univ-lyon3.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03763717
Contributeur : Jean-François GAJEWSKI Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : lundi 29 août 2022 - 17:21:09
Dernière modification le : mardi 30 août 2022 - 03:40:10

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-03763717, version 1

Collections

Citation

Jean-François Gajewski, Pierre-Majorique Léger, Marco Heimann, Prince Teye. Can Nudges Promote Professional Skepticism in Audits?. EAA, May 2022, Bergen, Norway. ⟨hal-03763717⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

2