Corporate Social Responsibility: Communication Effects, a comparison between investor-owned banks and member-owned banks - Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3 Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Advertising Research Année : 2017

Corporate Social Responsibility: Communication Effects, a comparison between investor-owned banks and member-owned banks

Sonia Capelli
William Sabadie

Résumé

For companies, communicating about socially responsible activities does not always lead to benefits. This article aims to contribute to a better understanding of the conditions in which such communications are valuable. The authors investigate the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication on purchasing intentions, according to the focal firm’s governance. Mentioning its member-owned business status in a CSR message increases the efficacy of that communication, due to positive general attitudes toward these organizations, and it reinforces the impact of the CSR communication on purchase intentions. For investor-owned businesses, both CSR and quality-based messages induce similar purchase intentions.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

hal-01618823 , version 1 (18-10-2017)

Identifiants

Citer

Charlotte Lécuyer, Sonia Capelli, William Sabadie. Corporate Social Responsibility: Communication Effects, a comparison between investor-owned banks and member-owned banks. Journal of Advertising Research, 2017, 57 (4), pp.436-446. ⟨10.2501/JAR-2017-051⟩. ⟨hal-01618823⟩
163 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More